Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kai Wehnelt vs Marko Tepavac Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wehnelt vs Tepavac analysis and find out who is favored!
Kai Wehnelt vs Marko Tepavac Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wehnelt 0 - 2 Tepavac
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wehnelt has won 45.53% of points on their second serve, while Tepavac has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wehnelt, in recent form, has won 50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tepavac has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.64% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wehnelt has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tepavac has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wehnelt has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 32/ 28), with Tepavac winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wehnelt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 82/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13). Tepavac has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 152/ 60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Wehnelt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.98% of matches (W/L 25/ 16), where as Tepavac has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Wehnelt winning 0 times and Tepavac being victorious 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Wehnelt winning 0 and Tepavac winning 4. The last match between Wehnelt and Tepavac was at the M15 Meshref, 16-11-2019, Semifinals, Hard with Kai Wehnelt getting the victory w/o.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wehnelt and Tepavac have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wehnelt winning 0 times and Tepavac 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wehnelt winning 0, and Tepavac 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wehnelt has played against opponents with an average rank of 150.42 while Tepavac has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wehnelt has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tepavac has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wehnelt has converted 43.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tepavac has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
607
Rank
513
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
174
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
55% (202-162)
Career Total W/L
65% (288-152)
47% (7-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$18,545
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kai Wehnelt | Marko Tepavac |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 13 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 28 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:30 | 1:15:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (52/107) | 63% (69/109) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (39/52) | 81% (56/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (23/55) | 55% (22/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 75% (6/8) |
| Return Points W% | 28% (31/109) | 42% (45/107) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Marko Tepavac
Player
Kai Wehnelt
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
13
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
25 of
29)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Marko Tepavac
Player
Kai Wehnelt
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
15
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kai Wehnelt | Marko Tepavac |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (17/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (161/156) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 61 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 177.87 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (610/990) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (427/610) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (173/380) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (44/102) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (388/959) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (7/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Kai Wehnelt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Luigi Sorrentino
Player
Kai Wehnelt
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
0
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Federico Cina
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Matteo Fondriest
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luigi Sorrentino
Player
Kai Wehnelt
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Matic Kriznik
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Kai Wehnelt
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Matteo Vavassori
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Leonardo Iemmi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
74%
(
25 of
34)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Kai Wehnelt
77%
(
73 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marko Tepavac Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1-6 2-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Marko Tepavac
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marko Tepavac
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Tepavac
Player
Sebastian Prechtel
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Marko Tepavac
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
43
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marko Tepavac
Player
Gergely Madarasz
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marko Tepavac
Player
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
12
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marko Tepavac
Player
Dominik Palan
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Tepavac
Player
Andres Gabriel Ciurletti
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Marko Tepavac
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
5
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
68%
(
30 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
31%
(
32 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
115
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
view more
Wehnelt Vs Tepavac Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Wehnelt are available here and Tepavac photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
